![]()  | 
| Human Right Abuse Victim | 
The Human Rights Act [HRA], in simple terms, it is a ground-breaking  piece of constitutional legislation as enshrined in the 1948 Convention  on Human Rights, is a set of fundamental principles which include rights  to life, rights to a family life, rights to privacy, education, freedom  of expression, a fair trial and other provisions.
The HRA is an  absolute term, but in some respects and some occasions, it is applied  subjectively by the courts. Is there a logical sense since by  definition, the HRA should be an objective absolute and hence require  absolute laws on criminal justice?
Should the HRA do more to protect  victims of crime and decent members of society than criminals? 
All over the western world especially, there are daily outrageous ‘human  rights’ claims hitting news headlines and one typical example is being  played out in the UK as test case for the HRA now. According to the  Daily Mail: “Mohammed Ibrahim [an Iraqi failed asylum seeker], knocked  downed Amy Houston, 12, and fled the scene without getting her any  help-leaving her trapped under the wheels.
He was driving while  disqualified and after the little girl’s death he committed a string of  further offense.”
But the HRA- which the Prime Minister, David Cameron  had personally pledged to scrap-has allowed Ibrahim to win his fight in  Britain. Ibrahim’s lawyers argued deporting him back to Iraq would  breach Article 8 of the HRA, which guarantees his right to a private and  family life. 
This ruling has caused public outcry and now the government is under  intense public pressure to scrap the HRA.
Even Government ministers have  expressed exasperation at the interpretation of the Acts by the courts.  Now, the government is committed to establishing a Commission during  2011 to investigate the creation of a UK Bill of Rights that protects  and extends British liberties and responsibilities.
There is numerous  stomach churning cases like: 200 drug-addicted prisoners brought a case  against the UK’s Home Office for stopping them taking drugs in jail and  won £3,500 each!
Another case is a claim by a man convicted of raping  and murdering a 7-year old girl that the court should grant him the  right to vote while in prison custody.
Today, serial killers, sadistic pedophiles, terrorists and armed  robbers and some human rights lawyers have turned the HRA simply into a  Charter for Criminals’ Rights which destroys all sense of fairness.
With Ghana’s increasing armed robbery, pedophilia, rape and murders,  isn’t it time we, Ghanaians wake up to rethink our country’s human  rights laws to suit our own socio cultural problems?
And what if the HRA  should be replaced with Ghana’s Bill of Rights and Responsibilities as  being thought out in Britain? Express your opinions as your  constitutional right!
Author: LONTO-BOY








